10182019What's Hot:

U.K. Moves Toward Making Adults Presumed Organ Donors

In the United States, to be organ donors, people must fill out forms or join an online registry, or their families must give approval; a few states have considered opt-out bills, but none have adopted them.

Photo

A National Health Service organ donor card. Though public opinion surveys show that a vast majority of people in developed countries favor organ donation, far fewer sign up as donors. Credit Clive Gee/Press Association, via Associated Press

Though public opinion surveys show that a vast majority of people in developed countries favor organ donation, far fewer sign up as donors, and thousands of people around the world die every year while waiting for kidneys, hearts, livers, lungs and other tissue to become available.

The European countries with the highest donation rates — Belgium, Portugal and Spain — have longstanding presumed consent laws. But in some countries, like Sweden, such laws have not produced high donation rates.

In 2008, Gordon Brown, then the prime minister, called for a presumed consent law in Britain, a measure that the British Medical Association has supported for years. But the plan was doomed by criticism from a government task force and by some religious leaders — in particular, some Orthodox Jewish authorities took the position that standard organ harvesting practices violated Jewish law, which prohibits desecrating the body.

Since then, surveys have shown rising public sentiment in favor of donation, driven partly by highly publicized cases of people who were forced to wait for organs. With the cooperation of rabbinical authorities, Israel has loosened its restrictions on organ transplants.

Last fall, Prime Minister Theresa May said Parliament should change to an opt-out system, and the government has invited public comment on the issue through March 6.

Several lawmakers from both major parties said on Friday that the success of a new law would depend largely on specifics that had yet to be worked out. Designing the program poorly could backfire, they said, making people distrust the system and increasing the rate of refusals.

Noting Mr. Brown’s experience and the uneven record of the laws in other countries, lawmakers advocated a “soft” system, in which families could refuse donation even if their dead relatives had not opted out. Most countries with opt-out laws have gone that route, but a few, like Austria and Singapore, have “hard” opt outs, in which the family’s wishes can be dismissed.

“There can be no question of the state taking control of organs, and that’s why the ability to opt out is central to this bill, and it has to be made relatively easy,” said Jackie Doyle-Price, a Conservative health minister. “It’s also central to this that the issue of family consent is respected.”

Source: NYT > World

comments powered by HyperComments

More on the topic