07262017What's Hot:

Just a brief question

Just a brief question.

When a bunch of Muslim radicals plunge a truck into a crowd of random people in a street, then start shooting at people or stabbing them with knives, that’s terrorism, right?

So how come when a Christian British native plunges a truck into a crowd of random Muslim people in front of a mosque, then attacks them with a knife, that’s hate crime and a revenge?

Where does this semantic difference come from? Same question about the reactions. In the former case, we hear “Let’s not jump to conclusions” and “Let’s not paint all Muslims with the same brush”, and “This has nothing to do with Islam”. But now we hear nothing of the sort, after the Finsbury Park attack?

How, who and what radicalized that father of several children who until yesterday used to just go to work, look after his family, and probably spend a couple hours with his pals in the local pub watching Premiership football on a daily basis? What caused him to go and massacre people he doesn’t know, and then sit in the police van on his way to jail and smile back at the watching journalists, as if he had just won the lottery? “A job well done”, he says. How’s he NOT a terrorist?

Is there a double standard here, or am I perhaps just reading too much into this?

Source: Talk politics.

comments powered by HyperComments

More on the topic